FLOCK cameras

Spoke in support of keeping Flock license plate cameras, saying the loudest critics don't speak for everyone and responsible use with safeguards is warranted.

Spoke against FLOCK cameras and AI surveillance, asking why the cameras did not prevent the In-N-Out tragedy and warning against expanding surveillance technology.

During the budget hearing, asked what happened to the FLOCK camera funding and urged removing all the cameras, citing national headlines about FLOCK controversies.

Opposed FLOCK cameras, citing reporting that the system collects far more than plate data and could be used to track associations through AI.

A resident of over ten years, he raised concerns about facial recognition, third-party control of the cameras, and lawsuits over misuse, and advised strongly against keeping Flock in the community.

Citing her family's military service history, she argued liberty is preserved one decision at a time and asked the council to terminate the Flock program, prevent its renewal, and remove the roughly 40 cameras.

He disputed Flock's security claims, saying cameras have been hacked and live footage streamed online, questioned license plate readers on playgrounds, and noted Flock's changed contract terms no longer state the company shall not sell customer data.

Said he's proud of how the community responded to the tragedy, and argued that community trustworthiness shows the Flock cameras are unnecessary.

Lifetime resident who wants the cameras removed, citing warrantless mass surveillance and constitutional violations; announced a signature drive for a ballot initiative on a city ordinance regulating them.

A tired late-shift worker argued flock cameras amount to one long Terry stop and a warrantless dragnet — a constitutional violation — telling the council to do better.